Cursing Out The Cat...

You'd be surprised at the deep-down satisfaction and joy it brings from simply cursing out your cat.

Oh, what's that?  Shock and awe?  Feigned vapors from the mere thought of cursing at one of God's creatures.  Well, to that I would offer that if God wanted a cat to have the intelligence of a pig, for instance, or even the family dog, then he wouldn't have made them likely targets for those desirous finding a lowly creature at which to curse.  And after all, cat's have the innate intelligence of a rock.  Beyond mewing incessantly when they want some gruel, and wanting to go outside when they're in and in when they're out, and looking at you like they'd attack you and kill you and eat you if they thought they were big enough to get away it.  

All of the time.

There may be those out there who have yet to discover that little known advantage of owning a cat.  That's assuming anyone can actually "own" a cat, which I seriously doubt.  If there's any "owning" going around, I'd say the cat's the one doing the owning.  

I mean, think of it folks!  Do cats come when they're called?  Ummm, no.  Do they obey even the simplest of commands?  Ummm, no.  Never.  They're just...there.  Looking all feline, and doing feline things.  Which, it seems, does not include honoring the requests of silly humans.

Anyway, besides the supposed advantages of owning a cat, I submit that being able to blame it for all your problems gives life a sense of new meaning.  Heretofore you would blame the rake when you tripped over the rake.  The rake hits you in the head and you spew forth a tirade of unrepeatable curse words.  Now?  You can trip over the rake, then cut loose with a string of expletives in the cat's direction!  Trust me, the cat won't mind.  He doesn't speak English.  Or any language for that matter.  He only speaks "food," and "mouse," and "sleep."  And you?  You'll feel soooo much better knowing that a carbon-based life form is the recipient of your displeasure.  

I've tried to confuse my cat by mewing back at him when he mews at me.  One would think he might respond in some way or other.  No luck.  He just continues to meow over and over...and over..., unabated, until he gets whatever he wants.  And trust me, after a few hundred mews, I give him anything he wants to get him to shut up.  And I'll continue to do so until one of us up and croaks.  

How did I get in this mess anyway?  Oh yeah, my eldest daughter suggested I needed a companion and thought it ought to be a cat.  So she got me one.  I always new she didn't like me...

Chuckmeister for POTUS, 2024!!!

Okay, fellow Pilgrims, after having given the idea quite a bit of thought, for more than a couple of minutes, at least, I've decided to hereby announce my candidacy for President of these here United States.  Now now, of course, in 2024! 

We know that The Donald will cruise to reelection come November 3rd, even considering the tens of thousands of dead Chicagoans, and a dead Supreme Court Justice, I'm thinking, who just might crawl from the crypt and vote for Biden.  Twice.  Or even more...

So The Donald will rule for another four years, no doubt solving during that term every single remaining problem our Representative Republic might still have.  I mean, he's already solved most of them, so there shouldn't be too much left to solve.  So I'm throwing my hat in the digital ring to announce that I want to run to replace him, knowing that I'll be older than the proverbial hills, meaning I won't be able to do much of anything meaningful, except crack inane jokes and make funny little animal sounds with my mouth, but also that there won't be so very much of anything meaningful left to do.  

In short, like the Hippocratic Oath demands, "First, do no harm," I won't do anything, which means nothing will get harmed.  

You're welcome.

Buuuuuut, I figure that by then the Democrats will be frothing at the mouth to get back into the White House.  They froth at the mouth anyway, but hey, I don't cast aspersions.  And mouth frothing is a Constitutionally-protected activity in the DNC(LOL), I'm pretty sure, so far be it from me to complain.  Anyway, I figure they'll be loaded for bear when that next General Election campaign season gets here, so I've decided to take a page out of their playbook.  Remember when good ol' Joe promised during the primaries to pick both a woman and a Black for SCOTUS?  Yeah, well I'm going to announce in advance my selection criteria for my Vice President.  Ready?  Here goes...

My V.P. will be a woman, of course, but not necessarily a biological woman.  She/he/it might well be a trans woman, which means she'd be a man anywhere but Taxifornia, thus permitting me to choose two genders simulfriggintaneously.  Am I smart, or what?

She'll/he'll/it'll also be part African-American, part Samoan, part Gypsy, part Native American, and part Albanian.  S/h/it'll also be suffering from myasthenia gravis, gout, diabetes, numerous autoimmune diseases and the "heartbreak of psoriasis."  Whatever it is will speak six languages including "rap."  And be able to juggle.  And be a practicing Muslim.  Although I don't think that takes much practice.  A Muslim that threatens to kill us if we don't elect s/h/it.  Also, "America's Got Talent" winners will be given preference.  

That little problem behind me, I'll then try and decide just what evil forces will be trying to keep me from attaining my goal.  I'll be trying to decide whether, in fact, I have a chance to attain the Oval Office.  And here are those nagging details:

The Pros:  

I should have the backing of:

  -  Republicans and Conservatives everywhere.  

  -  Plus Democrats who may be ready to leave the plantation.  

  -  Annnnd, evangelical Christians. 

  -  Nearly every single member of the military worldwide.

  -  Let's add in most police and fire personnel about here. 

  -  Plus a couple of TV stations, a few radio stations, a dozen or so newspapers and a smattering of websites.

That's seems pretty good, right?  Quite a bit of backing, right Pilgrim?  I might be able to win with these, right?    

The Cons:

The following will be doing their level best to make sure I don't emerge victorious:

  -  Democrats and Socialists and Communists and Marxists and Neo-Cons.

  -  Plus Atheists and Druids and those who wear those funny little pink hats.

  -  And those who don't wish to be bound by that "...pursuit of happiness" thing.  Just give them happiness, no pursuit deemed necessary.  

  -  Let's not forget the proud members of "Antifa" and "Black Lives Matters" and others who riot and pillage and plunder and vandalize and burn and loot and hurt and kill and shine lasers into eyes of police officer in an effort to permanently blind them.  

  -  Annnnd, university and college professors across America. 

  -  Right about here we add in all environmental wackos in all their radiant glory.  All those who want fracking ended and airlines shut down.  Those who want cars taken off the road and nuclear power plants decommissioned.  And those who want plastic straws and individual freedoms outlawed.   

  -  Let's include all union leaders and the members they've been able to cower into voting Democrat.  Probably several times.  

  -  Be sure to include illegal aliens who haven't started voting yet, meaning those who don't live in San Franpoopco, but fully intend to just as soon as Biden gets elected.  

  -  Plus, up to 85% of Black people and about half of Hispanics and nearly every single Big City Jew.  For no apparent reason that I can deduce.  

  -  And every inner-city dweller on welfare.  

  -  Let's include here nearly every member of the National Basketball Association and the National Football League and the Women's National Basketball League and our Olympic Women's Soccer Team.  

  -  And everyone who used to live in - but now currently resides at - cemeteries throughout Chicago, and Philadelphia, and Baltimore, and New York City.  

  -  Plus ABC and CBS and NBC and CNN and MSPMS, and NPR, and PBS, and CNBC and the Associated Press and the Hearst Corporation.

  -  And let's not forget the ACLU and the NAACP and the Southern Poverty Law Center and lawyers' bar associations nationwide.

  -  And websites like Buzzfeed, and the Huffington Post, and Vox, and MediaMatters.Org, and MoveOn. Org, and Slate, and the Daily Beast, and Bloomberg, and Netflix, and Amazon, and Politico, and Salon, and Axios, and Mediaite and, and, and...

  -  And magazines like The Atlantic, and Newsweek, and Time, and Cosmo, and People, and  and the Atlantic and Newsweek and Cosmo and Time.

  -  The House of Representatives.  Not all of them.  Just the Democrats in the majority.  And hopefully not all of them.  Just those who aren't yet "hippppmotizzzed."

  -  Plus, more than 1,100 TV stations and 3,300 radio stations and 1,700 newspapers across the Fruited Plain.   

  -  And, in summation, just in case there's somebody out there who's missed the glaring point, Google, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and nearly every other social media site you could possibly imagine.  

Hmmmmmm.  HMMMMMMM!

Never mind...  

"Weekend at Ruthie's"

Let me start at the end and work my way back to the beginning, okay?  Ready?  Here it comes...

Democrats are not all that bright.  Why?

Do you recall the 1989 movie "Weekend at Bernie's?"  You know, the black comedy directed by Ted Kotcheff?  The one where two guys go to their boss with a suspected crime in their company and the boss, a guy named "Bernie," turns out to be the criminal?  He invites them to his posh beach house for the weekend, planning to kill them.  In a twist of fate he's killed instead, leaving the two guys with a dead Bernie.  They wonder why they they shouldn't just stay and enjoy the weekend.  So they decide to go for it by propping him up in the corner and pretending he's still alive, enabling them to party hearty for days.  Their nefarious little plan works remarkably well, which brings us up to right now, right here, today, in 2020 America...

I don't know about you, but I just cannot believe that enterprising Democrats didn't adopt a similar strategy once they'd found out Ruthie had up and died.  You know Ruthie, don't you?  She was Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the Supreme Court Associate Justice who's been the champion of women's rights and abortionists everywhere for decades.  Just imagine, the "Notorious RGB," as her fans called her, lashed to a hand truck and carted around Washington, D.C.  She's about the same size as those hand trucks you see at the Home Depot, so one of those orange ones would have worked out just super...

Since we're in the depths of a Chinese Killer Coronavirus pandemic, all the Supreme Court Justices are now convening via "Zoom," so getting together in person doesn't happen.  As a matter of fact, nobody's seen RBG for months.  They could therefore have hidden the fact that she'd croaked for days and days.  Weeks, even.  Maybe even months!  Limited only by their efforts to cover up the, umm, well you know.  After all, Ruthie, suffering through a myriad of health complications over the past dozen years or so, has looked like she'd passed away a long time ago, so no one should have noticed the difference.  As a matter of fact, she was so small you could have put her in the trunk of your politically-correct Prius and driven her all around town if public appearances had proved necessary.  She didn't do or say much when she made a public appearance, so no one would have noticed she'd taken the celestial discharge.  In fact, why RGB's sycophants didn't hatch such a plan is all you need to know about their blatant lack of creativity (why didn't they call me?).

Like I said, Democrats are pretty dumb. 

Had her rabid followers lit upon such a plan, they might have avoided the reality now facing them in the Supreme Court; she's dead and Big Bad Orange Man gets to pick her replacement.  Against her dying wishes we're told (Hey Ruthie!  Judges don't get to pick their replacements!)  His 3rd Supreme Court nomination!  And, if Ruthie's replacement is approved in the Senate, Trump will have turned the Court into a 6 - 3 Conservative majority.  Which could, and likely will, make a major imprint on Court decisions for at least three decades.  Are Democrats happy about this?  Ummmm, 

                        NOOOOOOOO!

So we're going to be treated to a once-in-a-lifetime show, ladies and germs.  For the next five weeks we're going to be treated to Democrats vilifying Trump's nominee, no matter who she is (he's told us she'll be a "she").  And vilifying the Senate majority.  And vilifying Trump.  And vilifying Melania.  And vilifying Barron.  And vilifying the whole Trump family.  And vilifying Republicans and Conservatives everywhere.  There will be enough vilifying to last you, fellow Pilgrims, for a lifetime.  

Just remember this: they've given Trump, and us, my fellow Conservatives, an option:  Don't do what Article 2 of the Constitution tells the Prez to do.  Don't appoint RGB's replacement.  Let the NEXT Prez do it, hoping aging Joe will emerge victorious.  Be nice.  Be kind.  Like they are (heh, heh).  And unless we do?  They've promised to burn it all down.  "Biden voters," also known as "Antifa" and "Black Lives Matters" members, have threatened us with death and dismemberment unless we cower in fear and let them take charge of everything, everywhere.  Forever.

I don't know about you, but I don't plan on acceding to their wishes.  I plan on continuing to embrace my Conservative principles and suggest my Republican colleagues in D. C. do the same.   And everywhere else, BTW.  Yes, I suspect there will be some blowback over this.  I suspect that there will be some serious response to these never-ending threats to our lives and our livelihood.  I suspect those same "Biden voters" will try to "burn it all down."  But I suspect that they will learn a harsh lesson if they try:  

        Just remember, we're the ones with all the guns...

The "Spank-Free" Generation.

So how's that "no spanking" thing working out for you?  Me?  Not so well...

Near as I can tell, this is the very first generation of kids that we chose not to spank.  On purpose...

We were told not to do that, you'll recall, by all the "Dr. Phil's" on the Telly.  It seemed that every time we turned on Oprah there was some educational psychologist or other wagging their fingers at us over child punishment.  We were told that it would stunt their growth.  Or cause them irreparable mental anguish and harm.  We were told it would scar them for life!  They were supposed to be the experts.  We were told that.  And so we meekly did as directed, "sheeple" that we're proving to be, allowing little Johnnie and Suzie to cause unbridled mayhem without having their collective butts paddled.  I know mine was.  If you're reading this I suspect yours was as well.  And I'm pretty sure that such a level of corporal punishment helped in no small way to help make me the man I am.  Perhaps you feel the same.

So for the past thirty years or so we've permitted our yutes (what's yute?) to run roughshod all over our sensibilities while we kept our teeth clenched, hoping we'd made the proper choices.  Paddle little Johnnie, or ask him to forgive us of our transgressions?  Allow Johnnie and Suzie to compete and sometimes lose, or give each a "participation trophy" for...breathing.  I'm here to tell you Mr. and Mrs. America that if we choose to use recent events in Portland, and Minneapolis, and Seattle, and New York City, and Kansas City, and Albuquerque, and Rochester, and so many, many other cities as a barometer, our yardstick as to whether a good swat on the ass or a "time out" was the proper response to this generations' hooliganism, then that swat on the ass wins every time.  

Every. Single. Time. 

We've experienced more than 100 days of rioting in Portland.  Portland was always a Lefty city, but burning itself down is a bit extreme, even by commie pinko standards.  I'm pretty sure you'll agree.  48 of our very largest cities have undergone riots during the past 4 months.  All in Democrat-led states, with Democrat-led counties, in Democrat-led cities.  We've just been told by our insurance companies that the price tag for those riots now exceeds $2 Billion Dollars!* Wouldn't you just love to grab one of those black-clad little rioting White boys (3/4's are, BTW!) by the collar and paddle the crap out of him?  Make him scream for mamma?  Make him want to go back to his parent's basement and play video games?  

I certainly would...

So not being one of those who will just complain without posing a reasonable solution, this, fellow Pilgrims, is The Chuckmeister's solution:

     Require every single solitary kid, upon the attainment of their 18th birthday, to perform a minimum of two (2) years of service to their Country.  That Service may be in one of the branches of the military, or in the Peace Corps, or in any other formal, full-time, recognized, non-profit, Public Benefit Organization of their choice.  

     Upon the successful completion of that two (2) years of national service, the citizen will then be two (2) years older and smarter and wiser, and more ready to pursue the rest of their lives as a contributing citizen.  The Federal Government will then underwrite the total costs of two (2) years of a public college or university education, to include tuition, books, food and lodging, and provide guarantees for the payment for the other two (2) at the successful completion of the first two (2). 

I might mention that Israel, and the Netherlands, and Switzerland, and Serbia, and many other countries have such a requirement.  Further, you might be interested to know that they each require their citizens to go home after their military service with a military-issued, fully-automatic rifle to be maintained at-the-ready as a part of their national guard.  

So much for our 2nd Amendment being an outlier.  

I submit the foregoing bit of flummery in the fervent hope that you'll agree with me on at least one point:  My generation didn't burn down a single city.  Not even one.  Did yours?

*  A friend in the insurance business tells me that enormous recent fires and the riot damage from incessant looting and pillaging and plundering have tapped insurance reserves to the point that those companies may soon decline to pay future premiums.  

Is Rioting Tough?

I'm just asking for a friend.

A friend with a bad back, like mine.

He and I were commiserating with one another the other day.  We were both comparing physical ailments and illnesses and how these days today aren't like "the good old days."  You know, back when we could run and jump and skip rope and folks were peaceful and kind and considerate and followed the rule of law and spanked their kids when they screwed up and didn't double park and tipped their hat to a lady.  

When they wore hats, that is.  

Back when race was not a factor in anyone's mind except the race-baiting poverty pimps and left-wing neo-socialists who work overtime to bring down America.  And back when cops were honored for their service instead of being hunted down and murdered.  Back when going to church was legal and going to buy maryjowanna...wasn't.  Back when elected politicians still believed they worked for their constituents and actually honored their oathes of office.  

Back when setting fire to a courthouse would land you in jail...  

Now?  The Democrats have taught us that we have to riot to gain attention.  And also because rioting has become so, ummm, commonplace shall we say, it's seemingly no longer a crime.  It can't be, or else the cops that have arrested the several thousand rioters that broke jillions of laws in dozens of U.S. cities, nationwide, in more than 577 incidents over the past 3 or 4 months who have engaged in open, wanton, blatant, daily - and nightly - anarchy, would have been prosecuted.  And as you may have noticed, the total number of the arrested and prosecuted, all included, after burning and looting and rioting all over the place, including torching three horses to death in St. Louis, are less than 50.

And we should note that in New York and Taxifornia, perpetrators are quickly released and put back on the streets due to their new "no bail" laws.  Imagine that.  Anything less than murder and you're issued a ticket, a citation of all things, with instructions to appear in court some weeks down the road.  Zowwee, Batman!  We're living in Bizzarro World!

So what are Republicans to do?  Especially old Republicans?  Old Republicans with bad backs, particularly.  Like me and my buddy.  It seems that we were born and raised in the wrong era.  All this anarchy stuff was illegal back when we were contemplating extra-legal activities, and so we didn't.  We kept our noses clean and our asses out of jail, for the most part.  We did what seemed like the smart thing to do at the time; we didn't violate the law so we didn't get caught by the cops.  And if you don't get stopped by the cops, then it's unlikely the cops are going to kill you.  

Now?  You're nobody unless you've knocked over the local Macy's store!  Or ripped off a 7/11!  Or burned down a police precinct.  I mean, everybody has to riot just to keep up!    

So, being physically challenged, serious rioting is just not in the cards for my friend and me.  We just cannot riot the same way we would have as young men!  What's fair about that?  Nothing, I say!  I mean, by the time we get up in the morning, and eat our Pablum, and get dressed, and get an Uber down town, it's like Noon!  And then we have to be back to the Sizzler by 4:00 for their early evening "twilight" dining specials, so there's only about 2 or 3 decent hours available for rioting!  

Annnnnd, let's be frank here, Frank.  Likely as not, we'll be targeting the Target, and the CVS, and the Walgreens, heading straight for the Metamucil, and the Ben-Gay and the Depends.  After all, we really can't carry all that much with one hand (we need the other one for our cane!), so we have to be strategic in our choices.  And stuff like Dulcolax is expensive!  I mean, a couple of packages of that stuff and you're talking, like $50.00! 

So, a herd of us old fellas could not do all that much damage, but we'd sure like to try!  So I'd like to see some consideration given us, the older prospective anarchists.  Are we supposed to wear black?  The "Antifa" and "BLM" thugs do.  I don't think I have anything in black.  I do have a killer pair of Bermuda shorts, though.  Would they do?   How about a bus from the "home" be made available to take us to and from the riots?  That'd be nice!  In fact, I'd say it's elder abuse to refuse to allow us special rioting hours in consideration of our age and need for us to get back to the home early for our afternoon naps.  

Oh yeah, and by the way, my friend wanted me to ask, if we see anyone trying to burn the Flag, where should we put the body?

So, just asking for a friend remember, could somebody get back to me and let me know the in's and out's of effective rioting?  My buddy needs to know whether to quit his job as a Wal-Mart greeter and join the ranks of "Antifa" and "Black Lives Matter."  He says living on Social Security is almost impossible, so he needs the extra income, and it seems those rioters must be knocking down some serious scratch or they wouldn't be able to riot so much.  One good thing though, he's White, just like about 3/4's of the anarchists, so he should be able to blend right in with the mob...

In closing, I'd just like to add, we Americans are resilient.  When the going gets tough, the tough go rioting.  I guess...

The Making of "Cancel Culture."

So I was talking with a buddy the other day.  We were trying to figure out just how somebody becomes a "Progressive" liberal, and how we among the as-yet "unhipppmotizzed" can hope to avoid a similar fate.  Sort of like, "How do we avoid the zombies so as to avoid becoming a zombie?"  How your average, ordinary, everyday Americans become two-dimensional, believe anything they're told, pupils fixed-and-dialated, bits of foamy spittle coursing down their sagging chins, signs-waving, arms wildly gesticulating, slogans-spewing, full-blown socialists?  That conversation consumed our thoughts that day.  Yet, we just could not come up with an answer.

Yeah, I know.  I should't start a sentence with a "So."  So?

We were offering up possible reasons why somebody - anybody - could buy into that whole "cancel-culture" meme.  How someone - anyone - could conspire to put others out of a job, or out of a school, or out of a business.  How someone - anyone - could render fellow Americans as non-entities, on purpose, solely because they possess differing ideologies.  How someone - anyone - could be so base and crass as to wish their fellow citizens ill simply for the beliefs they hold dear.  How someone - anyone - could come to believe that being a "conservative" is some sort of social "crime," and why "Progressives" should want to hunt them down (figuratively) and eliminate them (figuratively).

And maybe not even "figuratively."  

Anyway, after a couple of beers and several other failed theories, my friend came up with what I consider to be a plausible rationale.  He offered up that he thought the incessant bleating from the so-called "MainStreamMedia," which I prefer to call the "Corrupt Legacy Media," - hey, it's a moniker they've so richly earned, and deserve - have caused many of our citizens to believe that Conservatives are real "Troglodytes."  Sub-humans who are evil to their core and need to be eradicated.  This unprecedented level of vitriol has contributed to their being held in disdain by those on the Left.  He said that the Media's incessant bleating has enabled these commie pinkos to think that Conservatism should be banned from polite society  simply because they hold dear the idea that government and taxation should be no bigger than absolutely necessary to accomplish the task.  He suggested that Leftists have been convinced to believe that opinions different from their own are now "racism" and "sexism."  And maybe even "homophobic" and "misogynistic."  Notice how that works?  In other words, if you disagree with them, you're a racist and sexist.  And probably a wife-beater.  

He went on to opine that this belief gives Leftists not only a "license" to
"cancel" their fellow Americans, it gives them the moral high ground to do so. 

We've stepped through the Looking Glass, fellow Pilgrims.  In just a few short months those who control our "CLM," and our higher educational apparatus, and the unions, and our entertainment industry, and nearly all of our Social Media, and the entirety of the DNC(LOL), and it now appears even our professional sports, seem to have finally tipped the balance.  Those of us who believe in Conservative principles are now the enemy.  And they're treating us as such.  As an example, some dufus named Alyssa Milano, who I'm told is (or was) an actress, and an activist, and apparently some sort of leader of this "movement," presumably because her career isn't doing so well, although you couldn't prove any of that by me, just Tweeted:  "The entire GOP should be tried for treason." 

I rest my case... 

Here's a question: Since they've declared war on us, isn't it about time we returned the favor?

One Looted 7/11 at a Time...

I've been doing a lot of research lately.

Old people with bad backs with a lot of time on their hands tend to do that a lot.  

Anyway, I've been doing research as to "who" lives "where" in our Great Country, and "why," and how that might have an impact on our electoral politics.  

For instance, did you know that about 20% of our entire population lives in what's considered our "rural" areas?

And - you ready for this? - 80% of our citizenry lives in what we term "urban" areas?  As in, Big Cities?  Now while that's sinking in, I'll provide a bit more context.

     -  57.8 million of our citizens are termed "rural."

     -  271.73 are considered "urban." 

     -  That, BTW, works out to 328.81 million citizens, according to the Federal Government, and upwards of 341,000,000 (Wikipedia) if suspected "illegal aliens" are included in that count.  Or maybe more.  Many, many more.  Which our Democrat "friends" are dedicated to including.

BTW, I'll stop calling illegal aliens "illegal aliens" when that terminology is excised from the Constitution of the United States.  

Why do I present this jumble of numbers to you, my exalted and highly-valued (and quite attractive!) readership?  Because it follows closely a previous posting I just published that speaks to the violence occurring on the streets of our biggest cities on a nightly basis.  More than 100 nights in a row of violent riots in Portland, as an example.  I've previously offered up that this rioting and looting and burning and pillaging and plundering and vandalism is either being applauded by the Democrats who run things in 48 of our 50 largest cities,* or tacitly ignored.  

In front of God and everybody.

Follow the bouncing ball here:  If, a), 80% of our population lives in our Biggest Cities; and b), "Black Lives Matters" and "Antifa" anarchists are destroying things in 48 out of 50 of our Biggest Cities; and the Democrats run those cities, all by themselves (not a Republican to be found anywhere!); then c), one might reasonably assume that those good citizens in those cities under siege might be getting royally pissed at their feckless and incompetent Democrat leadership!  With good reason!

Yes, we do live in "Two Americas."  There's the America that hasn't yet seen a "BLM" or "Antifa" thug anywhere nearby (like Wichita, KS, and Savannah, GA, and Souix City, IA and Cairo, IL), and very likely won't, and the America that's suffering through them nightly.  And 4/5ths of our population lives where the looting and burning and rioting is happening daily.  And their elected representatives - all Democrats - aren't doing a dam thing to stop it.

Chicago hasn't had an elected Republican in any aspect of its government in more than sixty (60) years.  John F. Kennedy was still alive the last time a Republican was elected to an office in Chicago!  So when those fun-loving "BLM" folks set fire to the vaunted "Miracle Mile," it's kind of hard to blame the violence on Trump.  

Although they try.  God, how they try...

Like I said in the previous posting, keep it up, you idiots!  You're guaranteeing Trump reelection, one riot at a time!  One Chevy dealership at a time.  One burned-out police station at a time.  One trashed bodega at a time.  One destroyed liquor store at a time.  One vandalized apartment building at a time.  One looted 7/11 at a time...

*  Princeton University Armed Location and Event Data Project. 

An Open Letter to "BLM"/"Antifa"...

 To all "Black Lives Matters" and "Antifa" anarchists nationwide, I'd like to say...

                                              KEEP IT UP!

A recent Princeton University Study, the "Armed Location and Event Data Project," reported that 48 of the 50 largest American cities have suffered through riots organized and staffed by "Black Lives Matters," a self-described neo-Marxist organization.  That is 96% of all of our largest U. S. cities...

(# 49 and 50 were Fresno and Mesa, AZ)

You remember those "BLM" folks, right?  That's the Marxist organization dedicated to the overthrow of America.  Those who doubt me are invited to visit their website.  It spells out their shocking intentions in "black" and white.  They wish to eliminate capitalism.  And patriarchy (homes with fathers).  And prisons.  And all police forces nationwide.  And they also demand oodles of $reparations just for good measure.    

But seemingly, no journalist in America is interested in reading it.  Or reporting on it.  Funny.   I had time to read it, some 4 pages of it in all, so why haven't even a few of the celebrated members of our vaunted "Fourth Estate?"  So we have a burgeoning ideological revolution unfolding right in front of our eyes, which just might mean the end of America, but no one in charge will address it.  Or even acknowledge that it exists...  

Hmmm.....  

The Study indicated that some 93% of all protests occurring in the past 3 months have been "overwhelmingly peaceful."  That was their reason for producing this Study, no doubt.  To "prove" that "peaceful protesters" are "peaceful."  That's like speaking the "quiet parts" out loud.  How quaint.  But in the reporting they actually proved the exact opposite; that some 7% of the protests, 577 in all, have been "other than peaceful."  As in, rioting, looting, burning, pillaging, plundering, assaulting, victimizing, vandalizing, and copious quantities of cop-bashing.  

In brief, there have been 2,750 "peaceful demonstrations," in some 2,440 locations in all 50 states.  Therefore, "Atlantic's" own Study proves that the 577 other-than-peaceful "protests" in 220 separate locations over a 3 month period were violent, dangerous and fraught with peril.  These would include the more than 1,000 buildings and 177 businesses burned and looted in Minneapolis.  And the Flagship Macy's store in Midtown Manhattan scoured of its inventory by anarchists.  And Portland's police headquarters gutted and burned.  And dozens of businesses on Chicago's "Miracle Mile" burned and looted and destroyed.  And let's not forget the more than 1,000 cops wounded and the eight killed since George Floyd died.

It seems that some "Black" lives are more important than others...

The "Black Lives Matters" folks tell us they plan on continuing to riot and loot and burn well into the future.  And I would personally like to thank them for doing so. For each riot in old, "blue" cities, where nearly 80% of our population lives, generates scads of new Trump voters.  Every time an "Antifa" anarchist attacks an apartment building and sets fire in the lobby, they create new Trump voters.  Every time a "BLM" thug invades a restaurant in Rochester, or Minneapolis, or the District of Columbia, and scares the crap out of the diners, they create new Trump voters.  Their choice to riot and burn and loot and pillage and plunder the lives and property of others is proof positive that the Democrat leadership in all 48 of these cities has not only failed to prevent this destruction, in some case they've actively supported it.

And in so doing, I would offer up, they are reminding the voters in these cities that voting Democrat is voting for chaos.  For anarchy.  For black-clad goons with Molotov cocktails trying to separate you from your property and your life.  They are, in fact, the military arm of the Democrat National Committee.  

And if you doubt my analysis, just remember that the "Atlantic" is the same magazine that just published a hit piece on Trump that was, and is, clearly manufactured out of whole cloth.  It contended that Trump didn't want to visit a military cemetery in France on a blustery, windy, rainy day a year ago because, four anonymous Trump-haters said, his hair might get mussed.  So far, 24 people who were actually there that day have claimed, on the record, that the story is 100% false.  And this is the magazine that gleefully reports that we don't have a thing to worry about because 93% of all protests are "peaceful."  

I'm pretty sure that 93% of sharks on any given day are "peaceful," but that other 7%?  Best not go in the water...

I don't know what will happen after Mr. Trump wins his POTUS contest on November 3rd.  I suspect this violence and carnage and rioting will continue unabated.  Perhaps it might even increase, given that these these anarchists have grown accustomed to breaking things and torching stuff and hurting people.  And they like it!  Or, once Trump secures his victory, I suspect he just might ring the "Insurrection Act" bell as he's been threatening, and mount a nationwide, full-bore assault on the assaulters.  

Now THAT could be delightful to watch! 

Mail-In Balloting Made Simple...

There's been a lot of disinformation about voting by mail over the past month or so.

That's because the Russian campaign meddling thing didn't work, and the Ukraine phone call impeachment scam thing didn't work, and the pitiful ex-lawyer named Cohen thing didn't work, and the pandemic so far hasn't worked, and destroying 48 Democrat-run cities through rioting hasn't yet worked, so they had to come up with something else.  And that "something" was that Trump is going to steal all those big blue mailboxes on street corners nationwide and spirit them away under cover of darkness, hiding them all in his backyard, right under the noses of triggered Hollywood stars, thus preventing poor Black folks in rural Arkansas with no access to post offices or e-mail from voting.  For the Democrats...

Those cads!

Except it's not at all what Trump wants, and why we shouldn't want it either.  

Trump is asking that any voting by mail is done via "absentee voting."  That means if you can't vote in person, you request a ballot from your state's Registrar of Voters.  He/she/it/ they then mails it to you.  You fill it out and mail it back.  Or hand-deliver it (preferable).  He/she/it/they then verify your signature and count your vote.  End of story.

But what the Democrats want is "vote by mail."  They want every registered voter in every state to be sent a ballot, automatically, without the voter ever having requested it.  Then he/she/it/they is supposed to fill it out and send it back. That's it.   

Except what about all of those on the voter rolls who've died since the last election?  That would be two years ago!  And what about all of those on the voter rolls who have moved? Maybe even moved out of state?  And what of those who've changed their Party affiliation?  And what about those who have become either mentally and/or physically infirm and no longer can accomplish that task for themselves?  Or are incarcerated (and not yet released by some uber-liberal state).  And what of those who didn't get their ballot because it was stolen before it was delivered?

Recent data indicates that the average state's voter registration lists are up to 20% inaccurate.  That fact, and resultant court actions, have invalidated recent elections in Upstate New York, New Jersey and Nevada, to name just a few.

On top of these potential pitfalls, the Democrats are demanding the implementation of what's called "ballot harvesting."  That means someone other than you filling out your ballot and delivering it for you to the post office.  This is quite okay for a family member to help, but not okay for someone with nefarious intent to insert themselves between you and your vote.  It's not okay for some anonymous somebody to knock on your door and take/buy/steal your ballot and put it together with many others and deliver them to the Registrar of Voters in their areas.  

That would be illegal.  But it happens.  Often.  In fact, it's all a part of the scheme to outright steal this Election if it cannot be won.  Example:  On Election eve of 2018 seven Republicans were leading in their legislative races in Orange County, California when the polls closed.  But then another 250,000 votes were mysteriously "found."  How conveeeeenient!  Just enough, it turns out, to take the victories from all seven Republicans and make the Democrats the winners.  

All seven of them.

And turn reliably "red" Orange County into a nice, "Progressive" shade of azure.    

They don't even seem to care how nakedly political the whole thing is.  How it looks, how it operates, and how over-the-top, one-sided it is.  But it will continue unless or until it is stopped.  And you, fellow citizen, can help to stop it.  DO NOT PARTICIPATE in unsolicited, mail-in voting!  Refuse to allow it, if you at all can.  Work within your respective states to prevent its usage.  And know going in that Democrats will do anything, ANYTHING to win.  Legal, or illegal.  Doesn't matter.  And if you doubt me, we now know - have evidence - that Trump's campaign was spied upon by the Democrat National Committee.  And once the Durham Report is issued, the extent of that spying, that unconstitutional activity, will be made public.

Until then, if you can go to Costco, you can vote in person.  If you can go to Wal-Mart, you can vote in person.  If you can go to the local liquor store, you can vote in person.  If you can go to Lowe's or the Home Depot, you can vote in person.  Just like we've been required to express our preference via in-person voting for more than 240 years, we need to do the very same thing this November 3rd.  

And on the way out the digital door, let me remind you of a salient point:  If the United States Post Office "worked," it wouldn't have lost money every single year since 1980...

White Privilege.

I've been hearing the term "white privilege" a lot lately.  Perhaps you have as well.

Apparently, White folks here in America are equipped at birth with a "special something" that makes it possible for them to become rich and famous and successful and well educated and the life of the party just because they're White.  At least that's what the Liberal weenies are telling us.  

Over, and over, and over, and over.  And OVER!  

Now, I'm one of "those" White guys, and I never noticed my life particularly blessed by virtue of my skin color.  In fact, I've never, ever noticed an advantage by simply being White.  I can't sing, and I can't dance, and I can't dunk a basketball.  And when I go to the 7/11 I'm forced to pay the exact same price for my Slurpee as the (fill in the blanks) guy in line right behind me.  And I can't even riot and pillage and plunder like my Black compatriots 'cause I'm supposed to follow "the rule of law," unlike those who are permitted to riot and pillage and plunder solely because of the color of their skin. 100 nights in a row.  The price of being a good citizen, I guess.  Is that a vestige of "White-ism?  The inability to riot without being arrested?  

And these days it seems being White poses another serious disadvantage.  I won't be getting reparations any time soon...

Now, I should say that I've noticed advantages accruing from showing up to work early and staying late, and trying extra hard at my job, and paying my bills on time and being super nice to customers.  And saying "please," and "thank you."  And pulling over immediately and being polite when a cop stops me.  Or better yet, not doing anything for which I could be pulled over.  But I've never noticed an advantage from simply being White.

I've noticed advantages accruing from studying hard and getting good grades.  From good grooming and keeping my nose clean and being considerate and extra sensitive to the needs of others.  But I don't think my "Whiteness" contributed all that much to those accomplishments.

Yet, some of our Black friends, and nearly everybody in the CLM (Corrupt Legacy Media), tell us that we (White people) have been blessed by enjoying a light(er) shade of skin pigmentation, and that we'll all do great in life thereby (James Earl Jones).  And the converse being, anyone born with skin of a darker shade is eternally damned by the "Pigment Police" to a life of pain and hunger and torment (Le Bron James).  That they don't have a chance in this life, and it's somehow White peoples' fault (Samuel Jackson, Jr.).  And that maybe nothing but a pile of reparations cash can make that problem all go away (Denzel Washington). 

Wait a minute:  They got the excess pigment, and we didn't!  Yet it's somehow our fault?  Wouldn't that make it God's fault?  

Oh wait, unless you don't believe in God...  Sorry for the interruption, Godless hypocritical Liberal weenies.  Back to the rant...

Just inserting here, I'm guessing there'a whole bunch of White folks in Appalachia who aren't feeling their "White privilege" so much this morning.

But here's a question you might wish to ponder:  The Democrats are telling us that all Republicans are sexist and racist.  Yet, it seems to me that Kamala Harris was chosen to be Joe's Vice President solely because she's a woman, and she's Black.  And they admit to it!  They ADMIT to it!  Isn't that racism?

We now know that the choosing of Harris had nothing to do with her being an African-American.  She's not. She's actually a member of the Southeast Asian-American (notice the "courtesy" hyphen?  You're welcome...) tribe, since her dad's from Haiti and her mom's from India.  It had to do with her being "Black."  Yet, if you'll notice, she's not "Black" at all.  She's rather a nice, pleasing shade of "mocha."  I'm about that same shade at the end of a nice summer vacation to the beach (if I could actually have one).  I'm pretty sure if I were one of those who demanded Biden pick a "Black" woman V.P. candidate I'd be major-league pissed!  Kamala is not Black!

I'm thinking we should maybe use the same sort of gauge to measure "Blackness" as we do to measure the window tint on our cars.  As in, too dark, you get a ticket from The Man.  Too light, you pay reparations.  And if you've been bestowed with the "Goldilocks" shade, you become Vice President.  You see?  

So, the act of being "Black" and a woman are now the most important qualifications for Vice President.  Not being management-qualified, or possessing military experience and accomplishments, not even a successful set of legislative wins that make one's time in the Congress notable.  Just "Black."  And a "woman."  Paltry, if you ask me...

Remember Rachel Dolezal?  She was the Washington State NAACP Regional Director a couple of years back.  At least until they caught her, that is.  Seems that Rachel is White.  Yeah.  She did some of that "stolen pigmentation" thing to pretend to be Black all her life, including hair carefully presented in corn rows.  And she benefited from it financially as a result.

And now we have another one.  A White professor at George Washington University just admitted she's lied during her entire career about being Black.  Sort of like Sen. Liz "Fauxchahontas" Warren who lied about being a Native American her whole life.  And both women made Major Bank due to those hypocritical lies.  And now I ask:

     "If White privilege actually exists, why would these women want to lie about being Black?"

We're but two months away from the General Election.  The People will then select whomever they want to run America.  And if that selection is a guy who's been in Washington, D.C. since The Flood, since Lincoln freed the slaves, since JFK was a tax-cutting Democrat, and a woman who's sole qualifications for selection is that she's a "she," and that's she's "Black," I'll have to say I'll be happy I'm quite old and won't have to live all that long under what could surely be the beginning of America's end... 

Vote carefully, America.  You'll be left to pick up the pieces...

Manufactured Racism...

"We are five days away from fundamentally transforming America..." *

                                                   -  Barack Hussein Obama, Columbia, MO,

                                                      October 30, 2008

I didn't used to be racist.  

And I'm still not.  Not yet, at least.  But the CLM (Corrupt Legacy Media) and whoever's pulling their strings (George Soros?) regarding their tacit - and financial - support for rioting and looting and burning and vandalism in dozens of Democrat-run cities are doing their very best to make me so.

Is that their intent?

I was born in the Midwest where we take people as they are.  We don't much care what color a person is so long as they're a good, solid citizen.  I went to school with Black kids and Brown kids and Yellow kids and kids of every shade and hue.  We shared classes together, played football together, went to parties together, laughed and lived together.  We didn't know that we should be cognizant of our differing races, since nobody told us to be.  Everything was about as good racially-speaking as one could possibly expect.

And then I went into the service.  And if one was ever inclined to be racist, serving in the military would wring that right out of you (there are no Blacks and Browns and Reds and Yellows and Whites in a foxhole!).  I can say with assurance that if you displayed any vestige of racism in the service your ass would be handed to you, macht schnell!  With extreme prejudice!

So I count - and counted - myself among the millions and millions of Americans who abhor racism and don't countenance it in others.  And I still do.   

I even avoided becoming a bit racist when one Barry Obama took to the throne and started spouting racist dogma for all to hear.  Remember the "Beer Summit?"  Remember when he said those cops were "...acting foolishly."  Remember when he said that Trayvon Martin "...could have been my son?"  Remember when Ferguson, MO was on fire for a bogus killing?  The flames of which he personally fanned?  Remember when he sent 8 members of his Cabinet to Ferguson to march with the rioters?  8?  When the rioters were screaming "Hands up, don't shoot!," even though the perp Michael Brown never uttered those words.  There are other examples too numerous to mention.  And so I stayed as before.

Until about March of 2020, that is.

Trying to take Trump down via the "Russia-gate" hoax didn't work.  And attempting to find something impeachable in lawyer Cohen's testimony backfired.  And trying again using a phone call to Ukraine to fuel impeachment didn't feed the bulldog, either.  And then when all else failed, politicizing a pandemic which China unleashed upon the Land with nightly rioting in dozens of big "blue" cities to try and wrench the POTUS-hood from his chubby, orange fingers has so far similarly failed.

So what have the Democrats resorted to now?  Accusing Trump, and every single one of his voters, of being racist.  I guess when all else fails you resort to accusations of racism and sexism.  I guess this is the update to Hillary's "deplorables" comment.  Dirty, nasty accusations of racism, the very worst possible insult one can hurl, designed to invoke hatred and fear and anger among the populace.  Deadly accusations that shut off conversation and start violence.  Deadly accusations that force the "natives" into "tribalism."  

All I can figure is that there's somebody, somewhere who wishes our nation to erupt in flames.  To cause race riots border-to-border.  To pit one American "identity" against another.  To cause another civil war.  I don't know why, and I'm not sure who, for sure, but I do know our society is teetering on the edge. 

To those who are behind this uprising:  Be careful not to overplay your hand.  You might just foster a backlash the likes of which you could never imagine.  There are a lot of really good people out there who just might be called upon to do some very bad things.  And remember, we're the ones with all the guns...

*  There were more than 30 reporters in the audience the night Obama made this statement.  I wonder why not a single reporter asked Obama what he meant by that?  However, nearly 13 years later, I think we now know...

Stop the Killing or They'll Stop the Dribbling!

So another White cop shot another Black man and it's time to riot.  And loot and burn and destroy and pillage and plunder.

As I'd warned in a recent posting, this sort of Marxist and facistic activity won't stop until somebody stops it.  Minneapolis' Mayor Jacob Frey could have stopped all of this before it even started by simply standing in front of his wall of cops on the night of March 29th and telling the gathering mob, "No!"  "No," they cannot burn down his 3rd Precinct Police Headquarters!  "No" they cannot riot, and loot, and burn!  Had he done that, this would have all been over before it started.

Remember a year ago when miscreants in New York City were throwing bottles of water at cops?  And when De Blasio kept his police from retaliating?  And how that's grown into full-fledged burning and looting and rioting?  Yeah, like that...

But Frey didn't do that.  He ordered his cops to stand down and abandoned his 3rd Precinct building.  He ordered his cops - against their will - to turn tail and run.  And we see what's happened since.  The "Antifa" and "BLM" "protesters," which we call anarchists, burned down the 3rd Precinct building.  At a $100 Million Dollar loss to the taxpayers.  And it's been followed by nearly 100 straight days of rioting throughout "blue" city America.  

The center of Portland is a war zone.  So is much of Seattle, and New York City, and Chicago, and Kansas City, and Baltimore, and Atlanta, and Minneapolis, and so many more old, "blue," Democrat-run American cities.  And since all this rioting and looting and burning and vandalism and destruction is occurring in Democrat-run cities and states, and, due to our Federalist sort of society, our POTUS cannot * do anything about it until he's invited in (Posse Comitatus Act of 1878), we normal folks are reduced to watching this carnage from afar, waaaaay afar, thanking God that we chose to live somewhere other than Portland.  

Anywhere else.

Yet, the Mayor of Portland is blaming his city's problems on President Trump.  He's saying it's all due to Trump's divisiveness.  Yeah, well...  It could also be due to Climate Change.  Or perhaps the occupants of UFO's.  But what's it's not due is to Trump, or anyone else besides this feckless bozo of a scared little man, clenching his buttcheeks, and hoping it will all go away...

And still every few days somebody Black gets killed by a White cop and whoever's behind all of this carnage will lose their lunch.  They'll go on a tear.  They'll riot and loot and burn and plunder.  And now, with a new turn, professional athletes, presumably bored from sitting around with no basketballs to dunk, have inserted themselves into the act.  They've decided that this killing of Black men needs to be met with some high-level athletic action.  Else-wise, they've decided to deprive us of their exalted performances.  Sort of like, if somebody in authority can't prevent some extraneous somebody somewhere from shooting a Black guy, somewhere, well then, they just won't play!  They'll take their basketballs and go home!  

Just such an event happened last weekend.  Seems like a cop shot a Black guy from Kenosha.  Turns out the cops were after a young, Black felon named Jacob Blake.  And they found him.  He was wanted for raping a 15 year-old.  He was placed under - and then resisted - arrest, put a cop into a choke hold, had to be tasered twice, reached for a weapon and was shot 7 times.  And our professional athletes rewarded his exalted memory by refusing to play in the following sporting events:

        -  NBA - 9 games canceled.

     -  MLB - 11 games canceled.

     -  WNBA - 6 games canceled.

     -  NHL - 4 games canceled.

     -  MLS - 5 games canceled.

     -  NFL -  9 Practices postponed 

I wonder if these overpaid, undereducated athletes are aware of how much money they cost their teams' owners?  You know, the people who pay them?  Or the folks that set up and clean the stadia?  Or the folks who sell peanuts and soft drinks?  Or park cars?  Or the nearby restaurants and hotels that their decisions rendered empty.  $Tens of Millions of Dollars were taken from the pockets of ordinary folks, many no doubt Black, due to the pique of these overblown babies, these shortness-challenged pukes.  

Questions:  How many people actually noticed these little "protests?"  And how many cared?  And what percentage of our population have now decided that this was the very last straw and that they'll never darken a sports stadium again?  Be warned, pro athletes, NBA viewership is already down more than 25% this year alone.  And it's now guaranteed to fall a lot farther...  

I don't know long this pandemic will go on, but I do know that the longer it does, and the more games our sports "stars" choose to arbitrarily withhold from us, the "little people,"  the less we'll care about them or the cute little kids' game they play, ever again...

*  10th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States prevents Federal military intervention without an invitation.

Donating to Marxists...

Did you know that if you click on "antifa.com," it will take you to "joebiden.com" directly?  No?  Then read on...

Let's say you're sympathetic with the "Black Lives Matter" movement.  Or the "Antifa" movement.  Or what you believe their individuals goals and objectives to be.

Let's just say that you believe Black folks have gotten the short end of the stick over the years and need a helping hand.  And let's say you'd like to give them a donation.  A few bucks just to help them along a bit.  And you've been told that giving money to these organizations would aid that effort.  Did you know that if you check the little box at the bottom right hand corner of their official website (blacklivesmatter.com), you'll be taken to "ActBlue." *  That's the outfit that handles such donations.  Nice of them, I'd say.  They specialize in delivering your money to Left-wing organizations.  

But what's not nice is that more than 95% of all the historic donations sent to "BLM" via "ActBlue" winds up with Joe Biden's campaign.  Did you know that almost all the money sent by nice folks like you to "BLM" goes straight to Biden and his Democrats?  Nothing to aid "Black lives?"  Not a penny to any conservative causes?  Even conservative causes that offer assistance to Black lives?  Didn't know that, did you?  

So legions of angry, disaffected, mostly White young people are rioting and looting and burning and destroying dozens of American cities, beating innocent people senseless, and engaging in all-out anarchy, all under the banner of "BLM," and "Antifa," and all they want is some of your money to keep the fires burning.  Nike has given "BLM" $25 Million Dollars.  Google has given them $100 Million Dollars.  Amazon has given them $50 Million Dollars.  In total they've received thus far more than $500 Million Dollars!  That's a lot of money for a cause started by a couple of Marxist radicals that didn't even exist until 2013.  And it's a lot of money being run through a non-profit that's being spent without any oversight.

Have you felt like contributing to "Antifa?"  You know, the fascist organization that dresses its folks in black ninja outfits, with masks, and sends them out to Democrat cities to riot and burn and loot and pillage and plunder, to throw bricks and shine commercial lasers into cops' eyes, who they do their best to hurt or even kill, all in the name of "racial justice."  

Can anyone tell me what stealing a Gucci purse from a Macy's has to do with George Floyd's killing?  Yeah, neither can I.  But there they are, night after night, throwing bricks and bottles of frozen water and condoms full of feces and baseball bats and tire irons at the cops and anyone else they perceive to be "the enemy."  And like "BLM," this is a non-profit, 501(c)(3) organization that bills itself as "anti facist."  Of course, every action it takes is facistic, so I'd say that's a real good joke there. 

And like I stated above, if you type in "Antifa.com," its official website, it takes you to "joebiden.com" directly!  They don't mess around!  Talk about transparency!  You try to give a few bucks to your friendly Marxist outfit and - "Shazammmm!"  You're delivered right to Joe Biden!  Are we to assume by this that Joe Biden is a Marxist?  Are we to assume that Joe Biden owns "Antifa?"  Are we to presume Joe Biden not only fully endorses the rioting and looting and burning and pillaging that's "Antifa's" stock in trade, he also endorses their political beliefs and aspirations?  

Hmmmmm?  

So "BLM" is Marxist and "Antifa" is facist.  And Joe Biden benefits financially from both.  The people lighting fires in dozens of Democrat-led cities on a nightly basis are financial tools of your friendly, modern-day Democrat Party.  The Party for whom all these miscreants work.  Chew on that for awhile, Liberal friends...

*  As per their website, and their offer, I've asked "ActBlue" for current financial information on their donations and spending.  It's yet to be provided...