Monday, July 30, 2018

The Electoral College

I bumped into an old friend the other day.  His politics are decidedly to the left of mine, so I was not surprised to hear him advocate for the dissolution of the Electoral College during our protracted discussion.  Funny how a few cocktails can engender such wet dreams.  

He said it was an old, outmoded and unnecessary body.  He said its role in tipping the Election toward Trump proved that it could no longer be trusted to carry out the wishes of the American Electorate.  He said just the NY vote alone proved how much more popular Clinton was than Trump.  He said, in summation, we should simply bow to the wishes of the 3+ Million more voters Clinton received than did The Donald, overturn the Election and seat Hillary.  

Oh yeah, he also thought that ICE should be shut down.  Sad case, this one.

I spent the next few minutes explaining to my friend why he should perhaps reorder this thinking on this matter (actually, why he was dead wrong).  First, I explained, there are 3,141counties in the United States.  Trump won 3,084 of them.  Clinton won 57.

I went on the tell him there are 62 counties in New York State.  Trump won 46 of them.  Clinton won 16.

Clinton won the popular vote by approximately 1.5 million votes in the 5 counties that encompass NYC (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond and Queens).  Clinton received well over 2 Million more votes in NY than did Trump (Clinton only won 4 of these counties, Trump won Richmond).  Therefore, these 5 counties alone more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote of the entire Country.  

These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles.  The United States is comprised of 3,797,000 square miles.  

When you have a Country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those that encompass a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of a National Election.  

I told him that I wouldn't even bother to dissect the California vote, as the New York example more than made my case.  But, for the record, Clinton received roughly 2 out of every 3 votes in CA, accounting for about a 2+ Million vote advantage.  Thus, Clinton received about 3 and 1/2 million more votes in total, but received them from only a tiny fraction of the Country.  But that "tiny fraction" contains the majority of our population.

The Bottom Line, I told him, was that America is not, was not, and shall not ever be a "democracy."  It is rather a "representative republic," whereby we elect those who represent and vote our interests in that "Federal City" called Washington, D.C.  

Then I added that just a cursory look at the mess called California can tell you what happens when the inmates take charge of the asylum, and that our current system sands the rough edges off of that potential train wreck if overlaid on the entire Country.  

As the woman asked Benjamin Franklin when he left Independence Hall that fateful day in July, 1776, "What have you given us, sir?"  "A republic...," he answered, "if you can keep it."

So, I summed up with this:  "Would you like a situation where candidates for national office would only have to visit, spend, campaign, run ads and shake hands in CA, TX, NY, IL and FL in order to control a majority of the Electoral College votes?  Which of course would leave the smaller states with no representation and no voice in national matters at all?"

He answered, "No."  How would you answer? 

Friday, July 27, 2018

Identity Politics...

Now, we all know by now that the Democrat Party began implementing what they euphemistically call "Identity Politics" a decade or so ago to try and divide and conquer; pit race against race, class against class, religion against religion and city dwellers against those in "flyover country."  Apparently, the idea was they could seize, and then hold onto power.  Forever.  And ever...

Fat chance.

Seems like the Democrats ran into a Blusterous, Bilious Blowhard Billionaire on the way to the Political Promised Place.  And he's tied them in knots ever since...

So they've whipped up the troops to "resist."  Resist everything.  Every idea, every suggestion, every vote.  Resist everything!  And they've been doing a pretty good job, for the most part. But there's this one guy in Lost Angeles that caught my eye.  Now THIS guy deserves the "Saul Alinsky Award for Overreach."  Ready?

Yesterday the L. A. Police arrested a guy named Barraco Clintez for taking a pick axe to President Donald J. Trump's  "Star on the Walk of Fame."  Those little jewels are located all over the sidewalks of the (once) beautiful, but now homeless-plagued downtown Hollywood, California.  The Donald's Star has been disfigured before, but this time takes the Little Debbie.  

It seems that Senor Clintez ticks nearly all the boxes; he's an illegal immigrant, half-Mexican, half-Black, hard-core socialist, with ties to "Antifa," who was paid by one of Leftist puppet master George Soros' companies to cast illegal votes while starting up Black Lives Matter.  

Now, I gotta' tell you, this guy leaves very little to the imagination in terms of "identity."  And you can tell by his resume that he takes his lot in life very seriously.  But it struck me that he is missing some stuff that might attract votes like a Hoover vacuum cleaner.  First, he should be gay, or at least a transgender.  Yeah, that would help.  And he should be a dwarf.  And perhaps an albino.  And maybe a recovering drug, alcohol and sex addict.  Who is lactose intolerant.  And suffering from the Heartbreak of Psoriasis.  And he could maybe stretch the definitions a bit and magically become a Gypsy.  Oh yeah, and he should become one of those Native American Indigenous Peoples (if it can work for Elizabeth Warren, it could surely work for Barraco).  Then, our Mr. Clintez could be prepped for his run for office, once all illegals are granted citizenship, as a... 

..."Half-Latino, Half-Black, Socialist, Albino, Gypsy, Native American, Terminally-Ill, Transgender, Dwarf, ex-Addict and Uninvited, but oh-so-welcome ex-Undocumented, but now Proud Future Voter." 

Now, see what happens when you take something to its logical extension?  Knew that you would...

Sunday, July 22, 2018

A Little Deeper Dive Into the NRA...

You've heard many times of late from the cable news talking heads, the Left-wing opinion-spewers that populate our TVs, and the Democrat politicians that own and operate so many old, huge and mostly bankrupt American cities, that the National Rifle Association (the NRA) is directly responsible for the recent rash of mass shootings we've encountered as a country.  

The "Left" has made demonizing the NRA its "go-to" villain for these horrendous crimes because, in my opinion, 

(1), they don't know what causes people to go off the deep end and shoot up a school or a mall or a church; 

(2) because they don't know what causes it, they therefore don't know how to stop it before it happens; 

(3) and because Gummint is supposed to have all the answers, or at least that's what all the Progressives tell us, they need to have someone to blame; and...

(4), ...they have therefore decided to place responsibility for this rash of shootings with the supposed inbred, toothless, pickup truck-driving, rodeo-going, beer-swilling, flag-waving, God-fearing, red nek hillwilliams who just INSIST on buying and using and carrying and keeping and bearing those awful, unnecessary and scary-looking, really evil awful guns.  

Long sentence, I know, but I never claimed to be an English major.  But I do claim to know whereof I speak.  I'm a qualified and experienced gunsmith, firearms instructor, range officer, competitive shooter and lifetime NRA member, and I'd therefore like to clear up a very few but important questions.  Okay?  Here goes:

Question How many of the mass murderers over the past twenty years were members of the National Rifle Association?  Precisely...

...Zero!

Question:  How many of the more than 16 Million Americans with concealed weapons carry licenses in the U.S. have been found guilty of a serious crime involving firearms over the past twenty years?  Exactly...

...Nada!

And how many of the NRA's management and staff killed, wounded, maimed, stabbed, choked, slapped, maimed, stabbed, wounded, burned or even insulted anyone in say, the past, say, twenty years?  As near as I can determine...

...None!

So, to summarize, mass shooters are mentally ill.  Only someone crazy as a hoot owl would pick up a gun and murder whole bunches of strangers.  And if guns weren't available, they would use knives.  Or cast iron skillets.  Or Louisville Sluggers.  We see that nearly everyday in Londonistan, where there's been a recent rash of mass KNIFINGSThe U.K. and most of the rest of Europe outlawed the private ownership of firearms decades ago.  So, no guns?  Use knives.  Or cars.  Or trucks.  Or bombs...

Or, like the Islamic Jihadist murdering cowardly thug in Paris a couple of years back, who shot up a concert venue for hours, murdering dozens and dozens, and wounding more than 400 with a fully-automatic, actual military-style machine gun, which has been outlawed for private ownership in both Europe and the U. S. since the 1930's, those who are dead-set on making others dead will find a way to make them so.  And anyone, ANYONE who tries to blow smoke up your arse by telling you otherwise, is dumber than a bag of hammers.  

Which, by the way, you should know could also be used to make somebody dead...

Thursday, July 12, 2018

Where do all These Protesters Come From?

If you weren't paying attention, you might be surprised to learn that 700 protests in dozens and dozens of American towns, attended by hundreds of thousands of presumably average 'Muricans, just concluded a week or so back.  

Yes, 700!  And each featured tens of thousands of - we're led to believe - ordinary folks, just like you and me, marching and chanting, and waving pre-made, professionally-produced signs, and screaming foul words at the top of their lungs, seemingly proud of themselves at being able to shout previously unacceptable obscenities at the TV cameras.  

In short, they marched to let us know that "Families Belong Together."

BTW, did you happen to see the recent classified ad in the Philadelphia Enquirer?  "Marchers/Protesters needed, $15 - $18 an hour, no experience needed, flexible hours."  The outfit doing the hiring was traced back to a guy named George Soros, the ex-Naxi goon who's spending $80 - $100 Million every Election Cycle trying to turn America into Venezuela.  (An in-depth expose will be forthcoming shortly from your favorite scribe about this Hungarian billionaire who was ejected from Europe and slapped with a felony conviction for trying to use currency manipulation to bring down the Bank of England.  He landed in Long Island, NY where he spends his remaining days using his dozens of owned and operated playthings, including MediaMatters.org, MoveOn.org, ThinkProgress.org and Snopes.com, to cause Trump and his gang trouble). 

And then a couple of days back, another major-league march is unfolding in Chicago.  This one is labeled to be "Against Gun Violence."  Well, Duh!  Aren't we all?  But in Chicago, the American city with the very toughest anti-gun laws, where it's almost impossible to legally buy a firearm, where 50 or 60 or 70 people are shot each and every weekend, and at least a dozen die (102 shot over July 4th weekend, 17 killed), the MainStreamMedia pays no attention.  At all.  Ever.  And that's because Chicago is run by Democrats, has been run by Democrats for more than sixty years, and likely shall be run by Democrats forevermore.  And because almost all these murders are committed by Blacks, against Blacks, and that upsets their deeply-ingrained meme.  And because they have no idea what to do about it.  And because the only answer to this slow-motion, "Groundhog Day," over-and-over carnage is one neither they, nor those who run Chicago, will ever accept.

And that would be?  There's a town in Georgia (Kennesaw)  where, as the head of a household, it's been the law for the past twenty years that you must have a firearm, and then prove you know how to use it, before you're permitted to own a home there.  And the result?  There have been no murders due to guns in this part of Georgia in more than 20 years.  That pill might be too much for some to swallow, but to them I would ask, how much safety is just enough, and how much is too much?  

Back to reality:  We're told these "ordinary folks" who participated in these protests just sporadically, organically, magically leapt up from their couches, turned off their TVs and boogied on down to Main Street to "join in."  To be a "part of the crowd."  To "peaceably protest."  Riiiiiiight...

Think about it:  A million or so folks, in dozens of cities, all gather together, at the same time, on the same date, all wound up and prepped with the same rants and chants, with pre-made protest signs, waving their fists above their heads in commonality...all wind up on Main Street, marching away, within 24 hours after the event they are protesting just happened.  

Ummmmmmmmmm, no, don't think so.  Takes a bit longer than that to arrange anything, must less a multi-faceted, multi-pronged, multi-city protest march.  Even one consisting of died-in-the-wool, dedicated, crazed, weirdo lefties, dancing to the beat of their own personal, inside-the-head drummer.  I mean, it takes nearly a week to arrange for the NBA Champion's team and its own home city to arrange for their parade!  And yet, it only takes a day or so to arrange for a million anti-______ (fill in the blank of your very own favorite Liberal "anti-" talking point) to get cranked up and marching down on your very own Main Street.  Example:  It took only 48 hours to arrange more than 50 different marches down 50 different Main Streets, including one on The Mall between the White House and the Washington Monument,  consisting of more than one million protesterswithin 48 hours of the Parkland, FL shooting.  Sound plausible to you?  Not to me...

So where does all that leave us?  In my opinion there's no other possible conclusion other than the folks at "Resistance Central" have plans in the hopper for all sorts of "march-able" protests, just waiting for the next school shooting, or kid separated from mommy at the border, or a cop to beat down and shoot some poor, unarmed Black preacher from the local St. Floyd's Episcopal Church, who was just trying to deliver some soup to poor old, blind, leprous, albino, LGBTQ hungry parishioners.  

Or so they'll frame it...