In response to my most recent posting on Egypt and pyramids and such, one of my oldest and dearest friends wrote this in response: "Hey Chuck: OK. You suggested "where" but not "why."
To bring those up to speed who were too busy trying to pay their taxes to read that posting (shame on you!), it had to do with the fact that there are Egyptian-style, reeeely-big stone pyramids all over the world. On at least 6 of the 7 continents, and maybe all of them. And they bear a strong resemblance to each other, even though there's no way there could have been any "collusion" between pyramid builders on difference continents 4,500 years ago.
So, with more than 15,000 pyramids dotting our collective landscape, all over the place, the question really has to be, WHY? And to a lesser extent, even HOW?
Lemme' cut to the chase. I'm one of those who tend to believe that if we couldn't build it today, with our amazing advancements in science, technology and materials over the millennia, and we couldn't, then someone or something had to build it for them, or teach them how to build it for themselves.
And whether that someone or something was from "Out There," or an emissary from "On High," or even if they're one and the same, matters not. It only matters that it simply had to have had help. The form or fashion that help took is for another debate.
As for this posting, I've stated my case. What say you?
No comments:
Post a Comment
The Chuckmeister welcomes comments. After I check them out, of course. Comment away!