The Democrats tell us they're all for "securing our border."
They want lots of new judges, and border guards, and lasers, and drones, and x-rays, and unicorn farts and all sorts of other stuff to "secure" the border.
What they don't want is a wall/fence/barrier/impediment of any kind. Why? Because that might actually keep illegal aliens out...
Whoa! What's the disconnect here? They say they want "border security," yet they do everything in their power to keep it from happening. Perhaps, just perhaps, they really don't want the border secure? Could it be they have some nefarious reason for choosing to give away our national sovereignty without so much as a whimper?
Yes, Pilgrim, they do...
They're looking for a whole bunch of brand-new voters! There. I said it. They want these hoards of new "arrivals," as San Fran Nan Pelosi, newly-enshrined Speaker of the House just called them, to become the Dems' brand-new voting bloc. They want to welcome them with open arms, giving them food and shelter and clothing and drivers' licenses and everything else they need to become new "Americans," without first requiring they come here legally. And without first insuring our citizenry, including our Vets and the homeless, are taken care of. By doing so they would insure they remain in control of both The House and states like CA and NY and MD and IL and OR and WA in perpetuity.
Think I've been smoking some of those anti-God cigarettes so much in favor out here in the once-Golden State? Wrongo, oh Conservative breath! They're already voting in San Francisco's municipal elections! Legally! And they're quietly voting in NY and NJ and WA and OR an so many other Lefty states that "putting this toothpaste back in the tube" will likely prove impossible.
So what's that number at the top of this little rant actually mean? The House voted yesterday on its signature piece of legislation. They called it "HR-1," meaning it's the single most important Bill they wished to pass. And what is HR-1? It completely reorganizes campaign finance laws and regulations, as well as how Congressional Districts are drawn. And oh yeah, it seems to indicate that new "arrivals," Dem-speak for illegal aliens, would be welcomed at the polls.
Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) noticed this little "error." So he put forth a "Motion to Recommit," as it's called, which was an effort to revise the HR-1 language to state, clearly, that illegals may not vote legally. Just as our Constitution clearly states. What did the Democrats do?
They voted 228 to 197 against the motion. And that 227 included 41 Democrats! Every Republican save one voted for the measure. And that one, Justin Amash (R-MI), was the "Republican" (in name only) who voted against our Constitution. (NOTE: This guy Amash is reported to be ready to jump into the 2020 race against Trump! Stalking horse Democrat?)
Think of that, my fellow 'Muricans: 41 House Democrats voted to make voting by illegals...LEGAL!
So now, when you hear a Democrat, especially one who's running for POTUS, tell us they're all for "border security," be it known that every single one of the announced Dem candidates for POTUS is against border security and for illegal immigrant voting.
Surprised? You shouldn't be. This is not your Grandfather's Democrat Party...
No comments:
Post a Comment
The Chuckmeister welcomes comments. After I check them out, of course. Comment away!