Your Place for Any Subject Worth a Spirited Discussion. Including those subjects banned by the five or six "social justice" oligarchs in Silicon Valley who think they should be in charge of our puny little lives...
Wednesday, July 4, 2012
We Don't Need No Stinkin' Congress!
A couple of days back President B. Hussein Obama issued a memorandum to his pants-suited Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napalitano stating that we, the United States of America, will no longer arrest, incarcerate or deport young illegal immigrants who meet the so-called "Dream Act-Lite" demographics. Those are, as loosely defined, little foreign people dragged kicking and screaming across our Swiss Cheese borders by their mommies and daddies prior to the age of 16, but who are now no older than 30, who have broken no laws, kept their noses relatively clean and are in school or the military, or have previously graduated/served in either or both.
Got it? If you made it here after you were 16, or are older than 30, no luck for you, Jose. Or if you pilfered some tortillas from the corner Rancheria, it's straight to the border for you, Javier. No passing "Go," no collecting 200 pesos. Boy, our TelePrompTer-in-Chief is one compassionate guy, right? Well, maybe not.
What could cause the Campaigner-in-Chief to bypass Congress, where such a change in American law must first be debated and voted on, and where this very same proposed law was soundly defeated a couple of years back, when the Preezy of the United Steezy was in complete charge of all aspects of Government, to take such a breathtaking and audacious action? And, by the way, why didn't the Toker-in-Chief issue an actual Executive Order proclaiming this new change of codified immigration policy, instead of a simple little memo to his simple little Secretary?
I don't want to sound all conspiratorial, but I actually think it might have something to do with the presidential election coming up in the fall (Noooooo!). Call me cynical but there's a seriously large bunch of Latinos here in the land of the not-quite-so-free anymore and the home of the still mostly brave. And every Latino either came here illegally, or knows a few dozen or hundred who did. I mean, there are MILLIONS of them! And many of them want AMNESTY! They're saying, "We know, we broke the law, but it's a dumb law, and others broke it too, so forgive us RIGHT NOW and give us real papers so we can stay and work and play and collect Social Security and food stamps. So there's 800,000 or so, or maybe twice that many, who could be affected directly by this action, and another 20 or 30 MILLION more whose vote could be influenced by the Golfer-in-Chief's decision to take this blatant, naked, unprecedented power grab. And a few million votes one way or the other would dramatically affect the outcome of the election on November 7th.
That's why I believe there may be many, many, many other egregious actions yet to come this year from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. And I think I know which one's next.
Did you know that convicted felons lose their right to vote in this here constitutional republic? Jack a car, burgle a 7-11 or embezzle a bunch of money from little blue-haired old ladies and you'll get convicted and sent to the Graybar Hotel. And when you get kicked at the end of your sentence you can no longer vote. Except, of course, if you live in Illinois or are dead. So, I Googled the matter and came up with a number. Somewhere between 10% and 20% of our entire population are convicted felons! That's like 30 - 60 million people! Talk about votes! That's a Mother Lode of votes! So, I'm making the prediction right now that sometime between now and November 7th, the Vacationer-in-Chief will issue a proclamation (that's what emperors do!), or maybe just a memo, unilaterally expunging the records of all of them, and thus excising their felonious actions. Poof! No more record, no more felons. And then they'll be able to vote. For Him (emperors get a capital "H," just like God).
Think He wouldn't dare? Just look at what He's already done that is unconstitutional, immoral or unconscionable and then ask yourself, who's gonna' stop Him? He's refused to drill on public lands or in the Arctic. He's ordered the National Labor Relations Board to tilt the balance in favor of unionization of every business everywhere. He's passed and signed unconstitutional legislation that subsumes one-sixth of our entire economy with Obamacare. He's begun redistributing our wealth from those who create it to those who vote for Him. He's nearly doubled the population of those collecting food stamps. He dropped an already-won case against the Black Panthers who offered to beat the crap out of those redneck crackers who tried to actually vote in Pennsylvania during the 2008 election. He sued (successfully) Arizona for trying to actually defend its own borders against an onslaught of illegals streaming across their border. And He's just declared Executive Privilege at literally the 11th hour to seal tens of thousands of documents subpoenaed by the House Oversight and Reform Committee, managed by Rep. Chairman Darrell Issa, from the Justice Department just prior to Eric Holder's Contempt of Congress vote. The fact that these documents pertain to the unlawful walking of guns by this Administration from border gun shops to Mexican drug gangs, and that they were subpoenaed more than 8 months ago, should tell the reader all he or she needs to know about the breathtaking corruption running rampant within this Administration.
And there's more that the Fundraiser-in-Chief can do to further guarantee His reelection. How about a memo to the Secretary of the Treasury ordering him to stop collecting FICA payroll contributions from the pay checks of those earning less than say, $60,000 a year? How about a memo to the IRS telling them to increase the income, capital gains and death taxes of those making more than $250k a year? How about a memo to the Secretary of Transportation instructing him to instruct the CEO of Government Motors to issue a brand new Chevy Volt to every Black and Jewish and Asian person in America?
Those are just a few things He could do to further divide our divided populace that would increase His changes of reelection. I'm betting you could come up with a few others on your own. After all, who's gonna' stop Him?
The only one who could is the serial liar and Chicago crook who runs the Department of Justice. I rest my case...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Luckily Chuck, humor is subjective....race baiting though? Not so much. Is that Your (capital Y for the blogmeister) attempt to bring together the divided populace?
ReplyDeleteOnce again though, we see no real answer, solutions or suggestions for a cure for the "saving of America"... why don't you think about, research and write a good post about a compromised plan (one that meets republican and democrats ideals half-way each- the only solution that might be approved) for us? I'd like to read that...
Thanks, MFL. I always enjoy feedback from the tens of folks who hang on my every word.
ReplyDeleteYou're asking for a real answer. Unfortunately, I don't have one. Neither does Obama, by the way. His (capital "H") answer to the problem is to refuse to honor his oath of office by enforcing the laws of the U. S. of A. Not the first time, either. I doubt sincerely it will be the last, especially if by torturing our laws into submission he can win another four years of golf, parties, vacations, speeches, adolation, free meals, first-class travel on our Billion Dollar airplane and the chance to further weaken and divide the Country which has given Him so much...
Come on....enough of the bravado bluster. You do not really believe that Barry is taking this job as serious as a Cal-Trans worker (well, five workers doing a job for one) or a Wallstreet CEO do you? You may not like what he does (no right winger does) but you can't say he's just goofing off until he starts collecting the lifetime salary. You're not that brainwashed are you?
ReplyDeleteIf the answer is yes.... well I guess that says it all- Ha!
I don't believe you answered my question regarding that "oath of office" thing. It worked pretty well for the 232 years just before Barry was immaculated. Doesn't seem to be important anymore. If a law can be ignored to pander to a key voting bloc, why not? I guess the next guy who gets elected can do the same thing. How would you feel about that, especially if it's not another uber lefty?
ReplyDeleteHA! Let's see..."I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." So that job includes upholding all the laws- and your saying EVERY President has achieved this? Really? Yeahhhh..... Come on Chuck- every president has had to pick and choose battles- and no president has closed down a border yet or tried to sweep up all the illegals working here (they have been here since the beginning by the way)- this isn't a recent phenomenon. And why not? It's not feasible with our man-power and resources... especially for the good they do- a lot of research shows illegals put more into our society cash-wise then they take out. Check it out yourself (from a non-political (biased) source please :) Think about it- they save business in labor costs, they don't claim any taxes back, they pay tax for items bought, they fund many a slumlord :), and make it possible for you to have a clean lawn and house for a fraction of the cost of a "local", and they aren't unionized! You must love that!
ReplyDeleteSo, your failure to answer my question...answers my question. Because they mow our lawns and cook our meals, it's okay for them to line-hop in front of tens of thousands of others who were dumb enough to fill out all the forms and pay the fees and wait the years to try and emigrate here legally. And it's okay for whichever brand of president we have at the time to "pick and choose" which laws to enforce. Just today the guy you so admire decided to no longer enforce the requirements of the welfare-to-work program voted for by both houses of Congress and signed into law by Billy Jeff Clinton back in 1996. What's next? The central theme of my posting above is proving me to be quite prescient. Just remember you held this belief so strongly when the next guy decides which of our laws not to enforce.
ReplyDelete